Copyright Books and Songs in India

From the music we listen to and the books we read, to the website, photograph, Video and products we use in our daily lives, each is a product of human creativity, and that creativity is protected. It is these creations of the mind, once expressed, that make up intellectual property.

Therefore, in business, everything, from your website, software, brand, packaging and logo should be protected. In a nutshell, all of your mental and creative 'outputs' can be transformed into tangible 'commodities' so that you can licence, sell, trade, divide or retain your rights to those 'commodities'.

So, as well as making sure your own creative efforts are rewarded and protected, by properly managing your intellectual property or Copyright protection.

What are the rights available through Copyright protection?

Copyright owners have the exclusive right to do or authorise the doing of any of the following in respect of a work or any substantial part thereof:

# A. In case of a literary, dramatic or musical work not being a computer program, to reproduce the work in any material form including the storing of it in any medium by electronic means;

# to issue copies of the work to the public not being copies already in publication;

# to perform the work in public, or communicate it to the public;

# to make any cinematographic film or sound recording in respect of the work;

# to make any translation of the work;

# to make any adaptation of the work;

# to do, in relation to a translation or adaptation of the work, any of the acts specified in relation to the work in sub clauses (i) to (vi)B. In the case of a computer program,

# to do any of the acts specified in para (A) above.

# to sell or give on hire, or offer for sale or hire a copy of the computer program, regardless of whether such copy has been sold or given on hire on earlier occasions. It may be noted that Copyright confers a number of rights, some or all of which can be granted to others either exclusively or non-exclusively.

What is done to the infringing copies seized during a raid by enforcement authorities?

Under Section 66 of the Copyright Act, the Court trying any offence, (whether the alleged offender is convicted or not) may order that all copies of the work in the possession of the alleged offender, which appear to be infringing copies, be delivered to the owner of Copyright.

Legal-Binding 'Work for Hire' Freelance Jobs

Work for Hire agreements are well-known legal-binding contracts between employers and freelancers in which the employer retains the copyright and ownership of any "works" specified in the contract.

A common situation is when an individual or a group of individuals produce a piece of creative work, such as articles or digital designs. U.S. Copyright laws automatically recognize the creator of the work as the copyright owner; however, the opposite happens under a "work for hire" arrangement. U.S. Copyright laws recognize the employer as the sole creator of the work and the freelancer as a contributor or an "employee" (if only temporary).

WFH agreements are becoming more common in the business world for the simple fact that companies want to retain ownership of their works. Complete ownership means companies can keep generating revenue from such works without paying royalties. For any WHF agreement to be legally-binding, both the company and freelancer must sign and date the contract, acknowledging all terms and rights.

If you freelance, the main disadvantages of this type of work arrangement are that you do not retain rights to what you create, you cannot license non-competing rights to the work, and you cannot demand your rights to revert to you. You are prohibited from modifying it, reselling it, or using your work because it is no longer yours.

Freelancers may encounter work-for-hire jobs from all types of businesses in different industries. Such jobs are common in copywriting, graphic design, computer programming, and newspaper reporting.

Here are a few personal tips from my own experience as a freelancer.

1) Make sure the WFH Contract contains a clause stating that the client does not own the work until the freelancer has received full payment. Clients might attempt to pay for half of the work and still retain all rights; it simply cannot work like that.

2) Not every WFH job warrants you to use all of your creative ideas to produce the work, especially if you want to use these ideas for yourself or for future projects. The client has the right to sue you for infringing on his or her copyright if you create a similar piece of work for somebody else.

3) Never work on your own materials while using the client's computer or other equipment. Your client may try to claim copyright because you've created something with the company's property.

4) If possible, try to opt for a revenue-sharing agreement with your client. This is difficult for small-time projects, but if a client hires you to write daily blog posts, ask if he or she can pay you royalties based on page views, especially if he or she is greatly profiting from your posts.

5) If the employer fails to pay you for your work, then the agreement becomes void and you retain ownership of your work. Copyright to your work should only transfer to the employer if all terms in the agreement are met.

The 5 Steps You Need to Take When You Receive an ISP Subpoena Letter

Copying music, movies, and software over the Internet using BitTorrent is now quite common. Sandvine recently published information on how much Internet traffic major applications used, and BitTorrent ranked as the number 1 upstream application, the number 4 downstream application, and the number 4 overall application behind Netflix, YouTube, and HTTP. What is worse is that many people do not even know that it is illegal to use BitTorrent or other filesharing programs to copy content. Given this background, it should come as no surprise that copyright holders have become increasingly aggressive about going after Internet file sharers.

While file sharing lawsuits started a number of years ago based on the sharing of music on services like Napster, Grokster, and LimeWire, the vast majority of mass copyright suits now focus on BitTorrent. Torrent lawsuits usually take the form of a copyright holder suing numerous "John Doe" or "Doe" defendants. The defendants are named as John Doe because the copyright holder only knows them by their individual IP addresses. However, once litigation has been initiated, the copyright holder can seek permission from the Court to issue subpoenas to the Internet Service Provider(s) of the various Doe Defendants in the case. The subpoenas to the ISPs will seek identifying and contact information for the Does in the case, including each Does' name and address, and usually telephone number and email address.

If you have received an ISP subpoena letter informing you that your information will be turned over to a mass copyright plaintiff in the near future, you and your family are likely under enormous stress. In addition, there is a lot of conflicting advice on the Internet - most of it posted by non-lawyers, or by attorneys who have handled few if any of these kinds of lawsuits. In addition, most of the online sources do not actually provide actionable advice. Below is an action plan that I recommend to clients, and hopefully it can help you resolve your copyright lawsuit.

Action Plain

1. Do Not Ignore the Subpoena Letter. Make no mistake about it - you have been accused of copyright infringement by copying content over the Internet, and the copyright holder has filed a lawsuit. This is not a laughing matter. There is a lot of bad advice on the Internet stating that you can just ignore an ISP subpoena letter. However, default judgments in excess of one million dollars ($1,000,000) have been granted in multiple file sharing lawsuits where Does chose to ignore ISP subpoena letters. Ignoring an ISP subpoena letter can literally ruin your life - don't do it.

2. Act Quickly. Take the ISP subpoena letter seriously, and get moving on it right away. With each case the key parameter of your action plan is whether you will fight the claim or settle. You will want to determine this before the date that your ISP turns your information over to the copyright holder. In particular, unless the copyright holder has been prohibited from listing you publicly, the copyright holder will be free to do so once it has your information, which gives the copyright holder additional leverage over you (especially if the content you are accused of copying is pornographic). Similarly, obtaining information about file sharers is expensive for copyright holders - it requires a successful subpoena. Once your name is "out there," it is far more likely that a second copyright holder will decide to pursue you.

3. Get the Facts. The first step in determining whether you want to fight the case or settle is to determine whether the accusations that have been leveled against you are true. Here is a checklist for your investigation:

General Background Questions   

Who are the computer users in your house?   

Of all the computer users, are any of them under the age of 18?   

Do you or anyone else in your household copy content over the Internet?

General Computer Questions   

What are the make and model of the computers in your house, including desktop computers, laptop computers, servers, smart televisions, gaming platforms, digital media players, including DVD players, Blu-Ray players, gaming consoles, hand held gaming devices, smart phones, and tablets.    Is a Bit

Torrent client installed on any computer in the house? If so, which ones?    Is anti-virus software installed on any computer in the house? If so, which ones?    Who is your broadband Internet Service Provider?   

Who is your cable or satellite service provider?   

Who is your wireless service provider?

Network Questions   

Is your network entirely wired, or is there a wireless router?

Wireless Router Questions   

What different networks are setup for wireless access? For example, it is common to setup a "full access" network and a "guest" network.   

Does each network have a password or is it open?   

For each network with a password, who knows the password?   

Does the router maintain a network access log, and does it show any unexplained activity?Based on your investigation, you should be assembling a picture as to what actually happened. Did you or someone in your household actually use Bit

Torrent to copy copyrighted content? If so, who did it? Is it possible that your computer was hacked? If so, do you have evidence that can support that?

4. Contact an Attorney. A skilled attorney can explain your options in far greater detail than a short article like this one. In addition, if you should choose to negotiate a deal, an attorney can arrange for your identity to be kept secret from the copyright plaintiff. Most importantly, a skilled attorney can offer guidance as to the right approach to take with your case.

Ideally, you will want to contact an attorney that

(1) has handled a number of these suits,

(2) is capable of litigating a case rather than just "negotiating a settlement" and

(3) is admitted to practice in your state and in the particular United States District Court that you live in.

First, file sharing cases are, at their heart, steeped in copyright infringement. Most attorneys have never and will never handle a copyright infringement matter, and have no knowledge of the particular idiosyncrasies of copyright infringement claims. Accordingly, it is unlikely that an attorney who handled personal injury claim for someone you know is the right choice to handle this type of claim. The same is true for an attorney who handles DUI claims or divorces.

Second, many intellectual property attorneys who are familiar with copyright law rarely if ever actually litigate cases. Accordingly, they are not going to have a feel for the actual dynamics of your case, such as how experienced the other side's attorney is, how much a reasonable settlement is, etc.Third, an attorney can only litigate a case in courts that s/he is admitted to. For example, copyright litigation attorneys at my firm are admitted to the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, and the United States District Court for the Central District of Illinois. While most file sharing cases are resolved without major litigation, your case may well require major litigation - if your chosen attorney is not admitted into the Court that the case will be tried in, s/he will need to retain local counsel, which will only add to your expense.5. Have your Attorney Seek a Demand. Once you know what the copyright plaintiff wants, you and your attorney can determine the best approach to take with your case. In particular, if the demand is low enough, consider paying it or having your attorney negotiate further. On the other hand, if the demand is high, your attorney can advise you whether you case can be won. You should know that litigating a copyright case be quite expensive. Many firms, such as my firm, offer ordinary families that are forced to litigate these claims advantageous terms so that they can fight a claim if need be. In addition, if you win your claim, the copyright plaintiff may be forced to pay your attorneys' fees.If you have received an ISP subpoena letter, there is no doubt that you are under a lot of stress. Undoubtedly you want to resolve the situation as soon as possible. However, it is important to approach this decision carefully and unemotionally. I hope that the action plan I outlined can help you do that.

What Is Copyright Awareness?

There is no standard definition for "Copyright Awareness". However, some critics have argued that awareness can only be defined in the light of what is being manifested in all forms of perception, knowledge and consciousness. In each expression, awareness is revealed as the ability to perceive (perception), know (knowledge) or the state of being conscious (consciousness).

Simply defined, awareness means you aware of something. Let us say "I am aware of road accidents" it is qualified as "Road Accident Awareness". Similarly, when "I am aware of copyright", this also is "Copyright Awareness". This means whenever there is awareness of something, that thing becomes the qualifying subject for awareness.

On this wise, copyright awareness is knowing that copyright exists and having knowledge about it. It is the state of having conscious knowledge about copyright in a perceived manner. When users of copyright materials exhibit this sense of awareness in an educational institution, it gives authors the opportunity to enjoy the economic value of their works and motivates their authorship.

Copyright awareness can be developed when conscious efforts are made to bring it into fruition. For instance, when copyright notices are displayed at various points where copyright materials are mostly used.

The importance of copyright awareness can be notice in its absence. That is to say that the absence of copyright can be noticed when there is the problem of uncontrolled copyright infringement activities such as illegal photocopying, plagiarism and piracy within an academic setup.

Awareness in all sphere of life is very challenging. In the same vein, Awareness of Copyright Protection has also remained a globally controversial aspect of copyright laws in respect of works eligible for copyright protection, works not protected by copyright and authors' protection under the copyright protection. This, however, reveals that a lot of people have little or no knowledge in this regard.

On the other hand, Awareness of Copyright Infringement (ACI) can be said to be the awareness that is created when people become aware, conscious, alert, and responsive that unauthorised use of works that are copyrighted is prohibited. Some scholers argued that before we can discuss what constitutes Awareness of Copyright Infringement (ACI), it's probably a good idea to lay out what specifically are the rights that are granted by copyright law that are likely to be infringed. For instance, in Ghana, according to Bosumprah (2009), "copyright is infringed when a work protected by copyright is used in any of the following ways without any permission from the copyright owner:   

Reproduction, duplication, extraction or importation into the country not for personal use but for commercial purposes.   

Distribution of the work for sale in Ghana".

This is because a work exploited in the above mentioned manner may be prejudicial to the honour or reputation of the author. This is why section 41 of the Copyright Act, 2005 (Act 690) regards an act contrary to the rights of an author as provided under sections 5 and 6 as infringement of copyright. So, since the copyright owner has the exclusive right to do all of those things (or to permit others to do them), infringement can happen when someone does any of them without the copyright owner's permission (Davidson, 2010).

Davidson (2010), however agrees with other scholars that "the majority of copyright infringement suits involve unauthorized... "   

Reproduction (as in copying a work) through photocopying, and this according to Panethiere (2005), is one of the common ways of infringing copyright in literary works.   


Distributing (as in copies of the work) through piracy. According to Panethiere (2005) this happens through unauthorised manufacturing and selling of works in copyright - what Osman (2010) regarded as Counterfeitingor the creation or distribution of imitations of genuine works with the intent to deceive the public about their authenticity.   

 Use of someone else's ideas or words, as in plagiarism, or using someone else's ideas or words without properly crediting the source, Osman (2010).

Further to this, Panethiere (2005) argued that"itis not necessary for a whole work to be reproduced or for more than one reproduction to be made for an infringement of copyright to occur. An infringement of copyright occurs so long as a substantial portion of a work is reproduced or other copyright use is made of it".

This is because what is a substantial portion is often subjected to a qualitative rather than a quantitative test. It is the quality or essence of what has been taken rather than the amount that is taken that will often determine whether the portion taken is substantial or not.

Top 10 Reasons to Register Your Copyright

The sheer act of creating an original piece of art makes it yours and yours alone. That unique beat, the words to a song, steps to a dance, or outline to a TV pilot: It's your intellectual property. This property, like real estate or a bank account, holds value and you should protect it. Certainly, if someone is to become famous from your musical ideas or reap vast profits from their sale, it should be you and not the person who ripped your ideas off.In an ideal world, no one would steal intellectual property and claim it as theirs. Even in a perfect world people can still innocently and independently create works of art that are functionally identical. Proving that you created the work of art first would be a difficult task at best. Nevertheless, just like there are vaults to protect your money and deeds to prove you own land, the law provides a simple way to protect your intellectual property: registering a copyright. With due apologies to David Letterman, and in no specific order, here are the 10 Ten Reasons to Register a Copyright:

1. A registered copyright puts the rest of the world on notice. It's your legal proclamation to the world that you own certain intellectual property and unauthorized copies are illegal. Registration warns would be thieves that any larceny of your ideas is at their own risk.2. A registered copyright protects your intellectual property from innocent, but unauthorized, reproduction. A famous example of this occurred when David Bowie sued Vanilla Ice for copyright violation over the hook to "Ice, Ice Bay." Even though Vanilla Ice claimed he innocently copied the beat (later retracted), he still owed David Bowie compensation for its use without permission.

3. A registered copyright gives credit where credit is due. This is a legal, public record that you are the author of a work of art, not someone else. Registration vindicates a very important principle beyond issues of money.

4. A registered copyright let's you sue for 'statutory damages' and attorney fees. In simple terms, suing for statutory damages means you don't have to prove that you actually suffered harm from a copyright violation. A typical lawsuit requires proving harm. You can sue for up to $150,000 for an intentional violation and up to $30,000 for an unintentional violation. CAUTION: you must register your copyright within 3 months of making it public to be able to sue for statutory damages.

5. A registered copyright, in a copyright infringement lawsuit, provides clear evidence that you own certain intellectual property. This means that the defendant in the lawsuit has the burden of proving that no violation occurred or they lose.

6. A registered copyright allows you to record the copyright with U.S. Customs. U.S. Customs in turn will protect you against the importation of illegal copies from other countries.

7. A registered copyright let's you stop someone from making illegal copies. You can obtain a court order that forces an infringing party to cease and desist from their infringement. This is what occurred when record labels sued Napster.

8. A registered copyright is necessary to sue for copyright infringement. In order to take advantage of the system, you need to be a player. You gain significant legal protection by registering your copyright under the laws of copyright.

9. A registered copyright provides legal protection beyond death. U.S. Copyright laws often create a situation where your copyright can still be enforced after you're long gone. Although you can't take riches to heaven, this would be important for someone who wants to provide for loved ones after they're gone.

10. A registered copyright saves time and money. It's certainly possibly to sue someone for stealing your intellectual property even without a registered copyright, it's just not a good idea. For some reason, waving a certificate of copyright, rather than lyrics scribbled on a napkin, just seems to go over better in court. Registering a copyright makes this legal process much more simple and cost effective when an attorney is necessary.

This is my list of the top 10 reasons to register a copyright. It doesn't mean that there are only 10 reasons, though, or that we can agree these are the 10 most important reasons. What other reasons are there to register a copyright or why do you think one reason is more important than another?

The Importance of Music Licensing Agreements

Working in the music industry is highly competitive and can oftentimes become stressful when handling money, legalities and costs or fees involved with producing and distributing music. Whether you are an artist trying to earn a living from your music or a producer and distributor looking to generate a profit from helping artists, hiring a music licensing lawyer is often necessary to avoid any potential legal issues from arising in the future.

A licensing lawyer who works in the music and entertainment industry can help to assist you with any potential legal battles, threats or disagreements you encounter whether you have written the music yourself or agreed to distribute it for an artist. Hiring a licensing attorney which works with music is highly recommended whether you are new to the music industry or simply seeking protection to avoid any legal confrontation regarding the music itself.

What is a Music Licensing Agreement?

A music licensing agreement is a contract that is often agreed upon between artists, record labels and music distributors depending on who is managing the artist and the type of sales that are planning to be made. Music licensing agreements cover the legalities of who has the legal rights and ownership to the music that is being made and sold and who is legally capable of benefiting from the profits that are generating.

Covering royalties, licensing rights and even costs or fees will also be covered in any music licensing agreement or contract that is drawn up by another legal team or your own lawyer. Licensing agreements may also include information about the limitations or restrictions involved with licensing the music to radio stations, online or even within television shows and movies. The more detailed the agreement is, the easier it will be to keep yourself protected legally regardless of the position you are in.

Who Needs a Music Licensing Agreement?

Using a music licensing agreement is necessary for both artists and entrepreneurs who are producing or distributing music as a business for profit. Having a music licensing agreement in place often involves multiple parties and clearly states all individuals' responsibilities as well as the profits they are entitled to earn once the music has sold. Keeping a music licensing agreement in place is a way to avoid any legal action or disputes between anyone involved in the entire process of creating, marketing and distributing the music to any size audience.

The Necessity of a Licensing Agreement in the Music Industry

Having a licensing agreement in place with any deal you make in the music industry can come in handy if you are ever faced with a lawsuit or if the parties and individuals you are working with want more money in the future that was not agreed upon. Having a licensing agreement can protect you financially and legally to keep your career intact whether you recorded the music yourself, distributed it or developed it as the artist or musician yourself.

The Benefits of Hiring an Entertainment Lawyer

When you hire an entertainment lawyer who specializes in working with music publishing and licensing agreements, they are able to read and review all paperwork or documents that you are required to sign to ensure you are thoroughly protected legally. A music licensing lawyer is also able to find the best solutions for you individually to ensure you are earning as much money as possible without causing issues or legal problems. Music licensing attorneys have the knowledge of various types of contracts, whether you are in need of a single song contract, or if you are searching for a partnership contract when joining together with an artist, producer or music distributor in the industry.

Having an attorney by your side while creating a licensing agreement or reading through one is a way to ensure you are making the right decisions to keep yourself legally protected at all times. A lawyer who specializes in licensing can also inform you whether or not the agreement or contract is fair to you and how you can benefit even more from the right type of agreement that is written with you in mind.

Finding the Right Attorney

Hiring the right music licensing lawyer is possible by asking for a referral locally in addition to researching qualified professionals online. Comparing lawyers who specialize in the music and entertainment industry is ideal to save time and to ensure each professional you are interested in hiring is qualified and experienced enough to take on your case personally.

Entertainment Law - How To Register Your Copyrights

You've created a song and want to protect your rights in it. As you may know, your song (or your short story, painting, etc.) is protected as soon as it is "fixed in a tangible medium of expression," which means as soon as it's written down, video taped, recorded, etc. Even without registering the copyright with the U.S. Copyright Office, you have certain rights in your song. You can potentially stop others from using it. But, there are three main additional benefits to registration:

(1) it creates a presumption of ownership and validity, so long as you register within five years of the date on which you release the work to the public;

(2) if you register the work before it is infringed, or in any case within three months of the date of publication, then you may be entitled to statutory damages and attorney's fees; and

(3) you don't have to wait to bring suit against an infringer (registration is almost

[1] always a prerequisite to bringing suit).

Fortunately, registration is both cheap (especially compared to its potential benefits) and easy. There is no reason why you can't register your copyrights yourself. In fact, while usually government websites are an absolute mess, the first place you should visit is the Copyright Office's website. There you will find a wealth of well-organized information, including some so-called "circulars" which explain everything from the nature of copyright to the exciting world of vessel hull registrations. However, what follows is a plain English explanation of the registration process and some helpful tips on registration generally.

The Cost of Registration and the Benefits of Filing Online

If you're reading this article, then you probably have access to the internet. That's good news, because filing your registration online with the Copyright Office only costs $35 per registration. To file online, visit the Copyright Office's website and click on the eCO Login at the top right of the screen. Before proceeding, you must register as a user (which you do by providing some basic information and creating a username and password). Once you register as a user, you will be able to log in and file your registration online-you can even upload documents to satisfy your deposit requirement (more on that later).

Now, for the sake of completeness, I'd like to point out that you can still file your registration the old fashioned way, using real paper. The next cheapest method of registration is the Fill-In Form CO. Like it's name suggests, this is the same form you would use if you eCO filed, it's just provided to you in a form where you can print it out and fill it in and mail it back to the Copyright Office. However, for that privilege the Copyright Office charges you $50.

If you are really old school and want to register using the old paper forms,

[2] then you may do so for a fee of $65. The only real difference between these forms is the price. Clearly the Copyright Office wants to eliminate paper as much as possible, and the old paper forms are priced higher than the Fill-In Form CO because the latter use special barcode technology that enables the Copyright Office to process them more easily. If you can, then you should save money and time by eCO filing.

Having registered as a user, you are now ready to begin registration. There are three elements to a successful copyright registration:

(1) completion of the eCO Form;

(2) payment of the registration fee; and

(3) the submission of deposit materials.

The FormOnce you create a user profile and log into your account, click on "Register a New Claim," and then "Start Registration." There are 12 parts to the application, most of which require some input from you, as described below.

(1) Type of Work

Naturally, you must tell the Copyright Office what type of "work" you are registering. By "work," the Copyright Office means the thing being registered. There are seven categories of works, and the work you are seeking to register must fit into one of them:

Literary Work. Examples include books, computer programs, compilations, instruction manuals, and speeches.Work of the Visual Arts. Examples include sculptures, paintings, photographs, murals, bumper stickers, decals, cartoons, games, greeting cards, and jewelry.

Sound Recording. Examples include any audio recordings (e.g., of music, songs, and audio books).

Work of the Performing Arts. Examples include ballets, operas, and musical compositions.

Motion Picture/Audiovisual Work. Examples include videos, films, and television recordings.

Mask Work. Examples include semiconductor chip registrations (yes, you can register the copyright in those, too).

Single Serial Issue. Examples include periodicals, newspapers, magazines, bulletins, newsletters, and journals.Usually, you'll know right away which category you work fits into (and you can only pick one). But the plot thickens if you are, for example, seeking to register a book that contains a few photographs in it. In that case, you have on your hands what is referred to somewhat cryptically by the Copyright Office as a "work that includes more than one type of authorship." The Copyright Office advises you to pick the authorship that predominates the work.

In other words, is it mostly a book that has a few photographs in it? If so, then register it as a literary work. Conversely, if it is mostly a book of photographs that has some limited accompanying text, then register it as a work of visual art. Note that no matter how you decide to designate the work, all the elements contained in it will be protected. In other words, you won't have to register the same work as both a literary work and as a work of the visual arts in order to protect it. What if the forms of authorship are truly equal? Well, just pick the one you like best. So long as you properly describe your contribution to the work in subsequent sections of the eCO Form, you'll be covered.

The one exception to that rule is for songs. As you may know, songs can be divided into different copyrights. You have the copyright in the sound recording, which is the recorded version of your song, and you have the copyright in the musical composition, which is the elements that comprise the song, i.e., the melody and lyrics. In the olden days, you had to register the copyright in the sound recording (as a sound recording) and the copyright in the musical composition (as a work of performing art).

Assuming you own both copyrights yourself and did not transfer them away, you only have to register the copyright in the sound recording, and then make sure you properly describe your contribution to the work in a way that includes the performance art elements, and you can obtain protection under both categories. Note, though, that you cannot choose the work of performance art category and then claim the sound recording copyright too. You must choose the sound recording category in order to capture both copyrights.

(2) Titles

Let's say you picked Sound Recording and pressed "Continue" at the top of the screen. Next, you must title the work. Remember to be careful when entering in the name of the work-the name must exactly match the name as it is used on the product you distribute to the public. Add the name and take a minute to verify that it was entered in correctly. If so, click "Continue" to proceed. (You'll have a chance to verify this information later.)

One question that particularly musicians ask is whether they must file separate copyright registrations for each song on the album (which could get prohibitively expensive). The short answer is no. The Copyright Office does allow you to register songs as "collections." So long as you are the author of all of the songs (either the sole author or one of the contributing authors), then you can register as many songs as you want at once.Note, though, that certain restrictions may apply depending on whether the collection of songs is published or unpublished and whether the ownership in the copyright is the same across all works. These nuances are beyond the scope of this particular article, but you can always contact an attorney if you have any specific questions relating to that subject.

I will provide one word of caution with respect to registering songs in collections. You can only claim one instance of copyright infringement per collection. This means that someone could steal every song in your collection, but because you registered the songs as one collection, you can only collect damages for one act of infringement. Conversely, if you had registered all of the songs individually, then you could collect damages for as many of the songs as were infringed. I do understand that most musicians can't afford to register 12 separate songs.

My suggestion is to register songs in collections, but then also submit separate registrations for songs designated as singles. Or (and this is a riskier solution) wait and see which songs from the record are popular and then register the copyrights in those. This way, you get the extra protection of an individual copyright registration, while also protecting the other songs in the collection.

(3) Publication/Completion

Whether or not a work has been "published" affects what you will need to submit to the Copyright Office in order to register the work (what you must submit is known as the "deposit requirement," and it is one of the three elements you need to successfully register a copyright). The Copyright Office says publication results from:

[T]he distribution of copies of a work to the public by sale or other transfer of ownership, or by rental, lease, or lending. A work is also "published" if there has been an offering to distribute copies to a group of persons for purposes of further distribution, public performance, or public display. A public performance or display does not, by itself, constitute "publication."Admittedly, that's a confusing definition in that in leaves a lot of questions unanswered. For example, is a work "published" if you post it online? The answer is "probably," but it depends. The above definition also does not specifically contemplate electronic transmissions, but you can reasonably assume that if you post something on the internet, it has been distributed to the public when they view that image on their computers. Still, if you posted the work on your private website that only certain people can access, then maybe it hasn't been published as that process is defined above. Ultimately, you must decide that question yourself.

Whether or not a work has been published, and if it has, then when it was first published, does have a bearing on the copyright registration. In the interest of space, I won't get into the nuances of those issues (although feel free to contact me if you have any specific questions). However, the question of how a work's publication status affects what deposit materials you must submit is addressed in more detail below.

Now, let's say you selected "yes" to the question of whether the work has been published. You must then complete a form that prompts you to enter some additional information, including the date on which the work was originally published. If you don't have an exact date, don't worry: just make an educated guess.

(4) Authors

The author is either the person who created the work or the organization that was the author if the work was made for hire. If more than one person contributed copyrightable elements to a work, then you'll need to list the various authors. First - if you are the author or one of the authors - click "Add Me." Then, select your contributions to the (in this case) sound recording.

Let's say you wrote the lyrics, produced the track, performed on the recording, and-because you self recorded and didn't transfer your copyright in the sound recording to a record company-you own a portion of the sound recording. Then you'd select those four boxes from the menu. If you need to add other authors, then you may do so, listing their names and then selecting their respective contributions. Let's say you need to add Bob as an author. Bob wrote the music to the song, performed on the song, and owns part of the sound recording. Then you'd select those boxes for Bob. And so on and so forth for any other copyrightable contributions made to the sound recording.

Note that I use the word "copyrightable" intentionally because the contributions you're registering must at least be sufficiently original to warrant copyright protection in the first place. For example, the guy who cleans the studio at night might be integral to your creative process, but he did not contribute copyrightable elements to the sound recording by merely being present in the studio. Now, if he picked up an instrument or suggested a chord change, then that is another issue. In fact, you'll notice that this "authorship" situation can get a little messy. Some bandleaders chose to have their musicians sign work for hire agreement in which they assign their rights in the music to the bandleader. This practice protects you down the road if your song becomes a hit and suddenly the guy who contributed handclaps to the record thinks he deserves part of the copyright in the song, and therefore part of the money it's bringing in. But, again, that's the subject of another article.

(5) Claimants

The "claimant" is either the author or the organization to which the author transferred the entire copyright. The claimant will often be the same person as the author of the work. For example, if you are registering your own song, and you own the rights to it, then you would be both the author and the claimant. But sometimes a record company will make you transfer the copyright in the sound recording to them. In that case, they would list you as the author of the work, but then list themselves as the claimant. If you are the author and retain the copyright and you are the claimant, then click "Add Me."

(6) Limitation of Claim

Does part of your song include an old folk song that is in the public domain, i.e., it's a folk song from the 1800s and you are using you own arrangement of it? Here is the portion of the registration where you would want to list that information. Maybe your song contains a sample. Or maybe you re-wrote a song of yours that you had previously registered. Usually, you'll just leave these fields blank, but in the event one of these exceptions applies, you'll need to enter the information requested accordingly. Although you want to answer these questions honestly, you ultimately want your claim to be as broad as possible, so make sure you aren't listing any unnecessary limitations here.

(7) Rights & Permissions

What if someone hears your song and wants to use it in a blockbuster movie starring Will Smith's son, Jaden? The information you list on this portion of the form will allow that person to contact you directly to license it from you. Or, if you'd prefer they contact someone else, you can list that information too. Maybe you have a company that handles such requests, or an attorney. List the appropriate entity, and keep in mind that the information you list here becomes public information, so only use your home address if you're comfortable with that. If not, then find a third party agent to use or acquire a post office box. Click "Add Me" if this is you and you don't mind your address being used.

(8) Correspondent

Again, this is probably you-the correspondent is merely the person the Copyright Office will contact if it has questions about the application. Sometimes this field will be occupied by your attorney's contact information if he or she is completing the application for you. As before, click "Add Me" if this is you. This information will not appear in the public record, so you can use your home address if you'd like.

(9) Mail Certificate

This is where the Copyright Office will mail your fancy certificate once your work is registered. Click "Add Me" if this is you. This information will also not appear in the public record, so you can use your home address if you'd like.

(10) Special Handling

Remember how I told you that one benefit of early registration is you'll be ready if someone infringes your copyright? If you don't register before the act of infringement, then you'll have to register in order to bring suit. And you can't bring suit until you have the registration in hand, unless you live in a jurisdiction where only filing is required. Which means you either have to wait up to eight additional months, or you pay $760 on top of the $35 registration fee to have the registration expedited. If you have to do that, here is where you ask for it. You must have a "compelling reason" for the expedited registration. One of the listed "compelling reasons" is pending or prospective litigation. Select if appropriate. If you don't need special handling, then skip this portion of the form.

(11) Certification

Here is where you swear that all the information you entered is correct.

(12) Review Submission

Here is where you double-check all of your information.

The Fee

Once the above steps are completed, you'll need to pay. Here is where you do that.

The Deposit

Now that you've fully described the work and provided other relevant information-and of course after you've paid Uncle Sam-you must satisfy the Copyright Office's deposit requirement for the type of work you're registering. Unfortunately, knowing what to submit is not easy. The general rule for deposit materials is that if the work is unpublished, then you must submit one complete copy of the work, and if the work is published, then you must submit two complete copies or the "best edition" of the work.

[3]If you're registering a Sound Recording, then this requirement is fairly easily met-simply submit either one or two copies of the sound recording on a CD (or upload the tracks if that is an option). Similarly, for a literary work, you would simply mail or upload either one or two copies of the novel, poem, etc. However, if you're attempting to register visual art, then this requirement become a little confusing and in some cases very burdensome.

First, remember that displaying the work publicly, without more, does not necessarily constitute "publication." So if you're registering that painting you have hanging on a wall of an art gallery, then you're probably registering an "unpublished" work, and as such will only have to submit what the Copyright Office refers to as "identifying material," i.e., a photograph clearly depicting the complete work.

On the other hand, if you had prints of the painting made and are selling them, then you have most likely "published" the work, and now you must submit two complete copies of the work (which in this case would be the prints you are selling). Similarly, if you're registering a three-dimensional sculpture, or artwork that is attached to a three-dimensional object, then whether the work is published or not, you still only need to submit identifying material, because submitting a copy is not practical.

Sound confusing? Fortunately, the Copyright Office provides a handy little chart, which does a good job of describing what deposit materials are needed for each kind of visual artwork. However, note that even if-according to the chart-you must submit a complete copy of the work, you may still seek relief under 37 CFR § 202.20(d)-(e). Basically, those statutory provisions allow you to ask the Copyright Office to waive the deposit requirement for you due to special circumstances-e.g., if for whatever reason the work is just not capable of being copied or it would be overwhelmingly burdensome for you to have to copy it. However, you must affirmatively ask for such special relief in writing, and of course your request must be granted in order for your registration to proceed.

Final Thoughts

Remember that, while you don't technically have to put the "(c)" on the work in order to retain copyright protection, you should, as it puts the world on notice that a copyright is claimed. That notice can prevent a defendant from claiming innocent infringement in a court of law, and the presence of the notice may also bolster your argument for willful infringement, which would very significantly increase your damages. Make sure to put the "(c)" followed by the year of publication and then your name.

Finally, note that the date of your registration is not the date you receive your certificate of registration, but rather the date on which the Copyright Office receives what they need to register the copyright. If you completed the eCO Form correctly, then that should be the day you submitted the completed online application. That's it! Your work is on its way to being registered by the Copyright Office. Now go celebrate by creating (and then promptly registering) more art.

[1] I use the word "almost" here because some jurisdictions do allow you to initiate a lawsuit upon the filing of your registration. However, you'll need to consult case law to determine whether your jurisdiction is filing-only jurisdiction. An attorney can help.

[2]Specifically, Forms PA, SR, TX, VA, and SE, which stand for performing arts, sound recordings, literary works, visual works, and single serial issues, respectively. While those forms are not used as much these days, the distinction between the various types of registrations is important, as will be seen.[3] The "best edition" applies if the work has been published in different editions, in which case you would submit whichever edition was larger, was printed on better paper, had more colors, etc.

Copyright For Non-Lawyers

If you make a short film that includes someone singing "Happy Birthday to You," until recently you could expect to pay a hefty licensing fee to Warner Music Group - or a heftier fine, if you used it without permission. A class action suit is currently trying to change that.Once, this decision would have only concerned those involved in the professional production of film, TV or theater. These days, it concerns anyone with a YouTube, Vimeo or Vine account.The Internet, along with the social media networks built on it, has created a plethora of opportunities for those who create video, music, photographs and writing to publish their work in formats with the potential for wide distribution. While only a fraction of us want to earn our living solely through the works we create, and only a small subset of that group succeeds, copyright questions have suddenly become important to many of us who would never have otherwise considered them.

First, a basic definition: What is copyright, in layman's terms? In the United States, copyright law extends certain protections for published and unpublished "works of authorship." This covers a variety of forms of expression, some of which are obvious - books, movies, songs - and some of which are not as well known outside their professional fields - computer code, software, architectural design. The deciding factor is that the work must be fixed in a "tangible mode of expression." Choreography that has not been notated or recorded, for example, cannot be copyrighted until it is fixed in a durable medium. You can't copyright ideas.

This requirement is one of the factors that distinguish copyright protection from the protection extended by a patent or a trademark. A patent is meant to cover an invention or a discovery in the abstract, rather than a concrete expression of an idea. For example, there is a current legal debate over whether the idea of podcasting - a broadcast available on demand - has been legally patented and by whom; meanwhile, most individual podcasts are indisputably protected by copyright. This protection is unrelated to the patent debate. Both patents and copyright are matters of federal law.

Trademarks, on the other hand, are words, phrases or designs used to distinguish the goods of one party from those of others. (Service marks are more or less the same, but distinguish the providers of services; the term "trademark" is often used conversationally to cover service marks as well.) An artistic design is automatically protected by copyright, but can also be trademarked, which offers overlapping, but not identical, legal protection. While federal trademark law exists, the majority of trademark law functions at the state level.

One of the major differences between copyright and patents or trademarks is that you have to file to receive either of the latter two. In contrast, copyright protection automatically extends to any work that is eligible from the moment of the work's creation. Creators can, however, voluntarily register their work with the U.S. Copyright Office. While this step is not required for copyright protection, it does confer several benefits. It makes the copyright a matter of public record and grants a concrete certificate of registration to the copyright holder. It is also necessary to register a copyright before taking any legal action against those violating it; it is generally easier and more effective to register before there is any dispute about the identity of the true copyright holder.

For those who wish to register, the U.S. Copyright Office provides the forms online; registration can be completed electronically or by mail. Registration involves an application form, a nominal but nonrefundable filing fee and a nonreturnable copy of the work being registered. It is generally simple enough for a layperson to prepare without help from an attorney. The application must be filed by the copyright claimant, who is either the author of the work or the author's employer (if the work was created for hire); the owner of the exclusive rights to the copyright, if the claimant has sold or granted them to another party; or the legal representative of the claimant (such as someone who holds the author's power of attorney).

In the past, people would sometimes mail their work to themselves, in what was known as a "poor man's copyright," in order to protect unpublished works. However, under current copyright law, this is unnecessary for copyright protection and doesn't substitute for copyright registration, so it serves no real purpose. Since 1989, creators have not been required to include a copyright symbol (©) with their copyrighted work. Voluntarily including it, however, can cut down on later claims of copyright infringement through ignorance.

It's important to remember that a work's copyright, registered or otherwise, is not without limits. One such limit is time. For works that were created on or after January 1, 1978, the copyright automatically extends for the author's life plus 70 additional years. If more than one author created the work, the term is 70 years past the last surviving author's death. If the work was made for hire, or the author is unknown, the copyright extends for the shorter of 95 years from publication or 120 years from creation. (The rules vary for works created before 1978.) After the term of copyright expires, works enter the public domain, meaning anyone may freely use them without prior permission.

There are some instances in which people are also free to use works that are still under copyright, under what is called the "fair use" doctrine. If you are the copyright holder, many rights to the work are exclusive to you. This includes most instances of reproduction (i.e. copying), but there are cases in which someone may copy your work without your permission. Whether or not a particular case is fair use is usually determined by a combination of four factors:    Whether the use is commercial in nature or intended for non-profit or educational benefit;   

The nature of the work being copied;   

The amount of the work being copied in relation to the size of the work as a whole; and   

The effect upon the market value of the original work.

There are no hard and fast rules as to when a particular use is in violation. For example, there is no maximum number of lines of print or seconds of a recording that will automatically qualify use as unlawful. Acknowledging an author by name does not substitute for obtaining actual permission to use a work. The courts, however, have established that certain uses, such as a teacher reproducing a work for use in a lesson or a brief quotation appearing in a journalistic article, are almost always legal.

Some creators also waive some of their automatic copyright protections. They may do this for a variety of reasons. Certain creators waive some of their rights as copyright holders deliberately, either for ideological reasons or in order to promote their work. Some authors feel that The Copyright Act of 1976, which remains the basis for most U.S. copyright law, is too restrictive and overprotects existing works to the detriment of new ones. They choose to waive rights as a way of leveling the playing field. Other creators simply want to make it easier for their fans or followers to redistribute their work, as a means of garnering publicity and making their voices heard. Creative Commons, a non-profit organization, is one of the most prominent organizations working to allow creators to legally waive certain rights while retaining others.

Creators also sometimes waive copyright protections in a less deliberate way. One of the major ways they may give up some or all of their rights as creators is to share their work on social media platforms, whose terms of service include language limiting users' rights to works that they post. The photo-sharing service Instagram caused a backlash among users last year when, three months after its acquisition by Facebook, it changed its terms of use in a way that many interpreted as a precursor to selling users' photos or using them in advertisements without the photographers' permission. In response to user outcry, Instagram removed the objectionable language. Its terms' current language is more standard; users retain full ownership of their photos, but grant Instagram a non-exclusive, royalty-free license to the images.

Instagram is not an exception. Sites like Facebook, Twitter and Pinterest also specify similar licensing arrangements in their terms of service for anything you post to which you hold the copyright. Yahoo!'s photo-sharing site, Flickr, allows you to set the default licenses on your photos from full protection (regular copyright) through "no rights reserved," but also specifies that users grant Yahoo! a royalty-free license to use the content on its own site unless and until they remove the images. While social media services generally incorporate such licenses mainly to allow their operations to function, it's important to realize that by sharing a photo on Facebook or Twitter, you are voluntarily waiving some of your copyright protection to the image. You should keep an eye on any changes in terms of service for sites you currently use and carefully review the terms of service when signing up with a new platform.

What if you have created something from which you wish to profit directly? As a copyright holder, you are free to reproduce, perform or display the work as you like and charge for doing so. A person buying a copy of the work does not affect your copyright; you don't, for example, have any right to a book just because you purchased a hardback copy. If you record an original song, you can sell as many copies of that song as you like without damaging your copyright in any way.Another method for profiting on your work is via advertising revenue. This is a bit more complicated, and the details are beyond the scope of this article. However, programs such as the YouTube Partners program or Google's AdSense for Blogger allow you to earn revenue in exchange for pairing your original content (such as videos or blog posts) with third-party advertisements. As the owner of your content, you have the option to profit this way if you so choose.

If you create something that fills a need or becomes popular, you can also consider selling licenses to others who wish to use your work. They might wish to use it in a derivative work - for example, playing the song you wrote and performed over the credits of their film or setting a poem you published to their own music. Or they might simply wish to distribute your work, such as showing a film you made at their independent theater. Depending on what they want to do with the work and your own preferences, they may only need to obtain your explicit permission, or they may need to pay you (a one-time fee, a recurring fee or residuals). You can limit your permission to use the work for a certain time or in a certain way. There are no legal requirements for this sort of agreement; it's up to the two parties to work out an arrangement that suits them both.

If you plan to license your work, you should definitely register with the Copyright Office in order to protect yourself. Given the potential complexity involved, if you choose to license your work, it may be best to involve an attorney who specializes in intellectual property. The attorney can help you draft a license or license template that reflects your intentions. Even if you do not seek professional advice, you should formulate your agreements in writing so that both you and the licensee are clear on the terms before there is any exchange of your work. While it is possible to transfer a copyright altogether, it is probably best to think long and hard before doing so, since you would give up all future right to the work.

What happens if someone uses your work without your permission? As long as you have registered your work with the Copyright Office and believe the instance does not fall under fair use, you can choose to pursue the infringer in civil court. However, before you do, it is important to consider whether it is worth the time and legal fees you may incur. There is a difference between someone selling a book that mostly plagiarizes your words and a teenager posting a photo you shared on Instagram on her blog without crediting you, though both are technically infringement. You are unlikely to be awarded much, if anything, in the way of damages for the latter.

Before pursuing legal action, you may consider contacting the infringer to inform them of their infringement and ask them to stop using the work. If they are sharing the work through an Internet service, you can also contact the website to let them know the user is in violation of copyright. This often violates a website's terms of service, and the company may take action accordingly. If the infringement is serious enough to warrant litigation, it is wise to seek legal counsel before making contact or filing a complaint with the government. (The FBI is responsible for pursing intellectual property violations.)

Copyright is complicated, but U.S. law is generally on the creator's side. In a world in which we share our thoughts and images freely, taking the time to know your own rights can keep you and your work protected.

Protect Your Artistic Work - Apply for Copyright Registration Now

opyright registration can be obtained for original works of art, literature, books, music, films, CDs and computer programs. Copyright ensures certain minimum safeguards of the rights of authors over their creations, thereby protecting and rewarding creativity. Creativity is the keystone of progress, no civilized society can afford to ignore the basic requirement of encouraging the same. Economic and social development of a society is dependent on creativity.
Protection of Rights of the Authors:
Copyright protects the rights of authors, i.e., creators of intellectual property in the form of literary, musical, dramatic and artistic works and cinematographic films and sound recordings. Generally the author is the first owner of copyright in a work. "Author" as per Section 2(d) of the Act means
  • In the case of a literary or dramatic work the author, i.e., the person who creates the work.
  • In the case of a musical work, the composer.
  • In the case of a cinematographic films, the producer.
  • In the case of a sound recording, the producer.
  • In the case of a photograph, the photographer.
  • In the case of any literary, dramatic, musical or artistic work which is computer-generated, the person who causes the work to be created.
Terms of Copyright:Sections 22 to 29 deal with the terms of copyright in respect of published literary, dramatic, musical and artistic works; anonymous and pseudonymous; posthumous, photographs, cinematographic films, sound recording, Government works, works of PSUs and works of international organizations.
Literary, dramatic, musical or artistic works enjoy copyright protection for the lifetime of the author plus 60 years beyond i.e. 60 years after his death. In the case of joint authorship which implies collaboration of two or more authors in the production of the work, the term of copyright is to be construed as a reference to the author who dies last.
In the case of copyright in posthumous, anonymous and pseudonymous works, photographs, cinematographic films, sound recordings, works of Government, public undertaking and international organizations, the term of protection is 60 years from the beginning of the calendar year next following the year in which the work has been first published.
Assignment of Copyright:
The owner of the copyright in an existing work or the prospective owner of the copyright in a future work may assign to any person the copyright. Section 18 of the Copyright Act provides for the assignment of copyright in an existing work as well as future work.
In both the cases an assignment may be made of the copyright either wholly or partially and generally or subject to limitations and that too for the whole period of copyright or part thereof.
However, in case of assignment of copyright in any future work, the assignment has the real effect only when the work comes into existence. Section 18(3) explains that an assignee in respect of assignment of the copyright in future work includes the legal representative of the assignee, if the assignee dies before the work comes into existence.
End Note:
It also helps you to protect your work from infringement. Section 54 to 62 of the Copyright Act, provides civil remedies for copyright remedies and Section 55 deals with remedies like injunctions, damages and accounts as are conferred by law for the infringement of a right.

Email Yourself To Protect Your Own Copyright

Email yourself a copy or document of your work, which you want protected by a copyright. Do this before you ever post it online, or anywhere else! You will then see a time-stamp at the corner of your email. This is what helps protect your work, only if it hasn't appeared anywhere else but in the email you sent to yourself. The time-stamp proves that you made or wrote that work, because it is the first known date and incidence. Much like guessing an outcome, knowing that it will be right, but you don't want to say anything publicly because you are afraid that if you are wrong that you won't like what other people say about you, and your prediction came true, how would anyone know whether you predicted that before the event, or if you watched the event unfold? This is the basic functioning of an Emailer's Copyright, to prove you made the work before anyone else!
There is nothing worse than having to spend around $25 bucks to register your own work, especially if you are a regular creator or content provider, who has to worry about registering each work when you don't have the time, nor the money to even pull this off! But now is different, now you are doing this for free, without ever having to use a "poor man's copyright"! A poor man's copyright, for those of you who do not know, is where you put your written document or your materials into a mailing envelope, then you mail it to yourself. First of all, it's rather easy to fake this process, because you could just have your envelope time-stamped, then afterward put anything you want in it, even if it's something different that wasn't originally intended in that mail envelope!
An Emailer's Copyright could very well hold up in court, if you have the emails at hand or that you may have printed. You would have to alert the judge ahead of time to let them know you are bringing an electronic or digital device, by telling them the devices are what holds the proof of the copyright infringement. If you don't alert the judge, it raises concerns for getting your device into the courtroom, especially past security, and if the judge thinks you are trying to play on it while in court. Save your emails that you send to yourself, preferably in a folder called "Copyrights", as these will always be around, and you should also have your emails printed out after you send them to yourself!

Film Copyrights On Practical Applications

In universities, academicians explore new ways of teaching their students. To be more effective in what they do, they come up with ideas on how to make their points come across as clearly as possible. Some do outdoor activities while others give as many exams as possible. There are also some who rely on creating visual presentations. For example, "performing" or showing a movie. This essential activity may require attention especially with regards to copyrights. It is important to make sure you are not violating copyright law.
Compliance with copyright law
Many if not all material you find on the internet is protected under US copyright laws. These laws provide the copyright owner exclusive right to reproduce and distribute copies of their works to others. However, any other person who copies, downloads and uploads a copyrighted work without a written permission from the content owner is committing a crime. They can be charged with copyright infringement.
The most common way of unauthorized reproduction involves peer-to-peer (P2P) file sharing services like BitTorrent. Through P2P connection, users get to share music or movie files. Those who get caught doing this kind of illegal activity will be subject to sanctions.
Obtaining copyright permissions
According to Stanford University Libraries' page about copyright and fair use, the basics of getting permission involve five simple steps. First, in every situation, you have to determine whether or not you need to ask for permission. Remember that creative work created or published after 1922 is protected by US copyright law. With exceptions such as "fair use," you need to check if your unauthorized use may still be legal. Also, you have to know and minimize the risk of not asking for permission. Second, in obtaining permission, it is crucial to identify and know the owner of the work you want to use. The third step in getting permission is to identify the rights you need. This means, finding out the exclusivity, term and territory involving your permissions agreement. Since, getting permission takes one to three months, the fourth step involves planning ahead for the permission and negotiating whether payment is required. Obtaining copyright permission must be done before you want to use the copyrighted work. Finally, get your terms of agreement in writing. It is a mistake to rely on oral permission.
It is best to educate everyone about the importance of complying with copyright laws. We can start by discussing about film copyrights on practical applications as well as the entities that protect them. Make them understand their responsibility and the penalties associated when you commit copyright infringement.
Copyright Collections Ltd. [http://copyrightcollectionsltd.com/] is an entity that protects film copyrights. Our duty is to preserve the rights of creators, producers and distributors of the copyrighted work. By following formal compliance with the laws, we operate on copyright claims against infringers.

Consequences of Downloading Movies Illegally

Downloading movies illegally is considered stealing, and just like any other crimes, it comes with different consequences. One of the most recent examples of such consequences is the TCYK letter sent to internet subscribers accused of downloading and sharing copyrighted materials. This letter served as copyright infringement notices, and they must be responded to immediately so that the recipients need not appear in court, put their names to shame, and go through so much expense and hassle.
Here are some more consequences of illegally downloading movies and other copyrighted materials:
*Criminal and Civil Penalties
Copyright infringement penalties vary from one country to another, but if you are from the U.S., the FBI handles the investigation and implementation of copyright laws here, and violators face up to 5 years in prison and/or fines that could reach to $250,000 or even more. Aside from criminal penalties, accused infringers may be sued by copyright owners, and if the former loses the law suit, he should be able to pay back the entire copyright holder's lost profits. The violator is also asked to pay for the opposite party's legal fees, including attorney fees. Plus, he could be forced to pay an amount of $200-$150,000 for the punitive damages, which is usually determined by a jury.
*Viruses
Free torrent sites usually have viruses and ad-ware that could be transmitted to your device and therefore cause damage to your PCs, phones, tablets, or laptops. This is why downloading movies or TV shows via illegal file-sharing sources are often unsafe.
*Loss of Profits to Creatives
Lastly and most importantly, you are not supporting the entertainment industry if you choose to download free movies online rather than buying theatre tickets or original DVDs. Directors, producers, authors, actors, and movie crew lose the profits that they deserve just because of rampant illegal downloading online. Now, how could these creative individuals be able to produce other entertaining shows and films if you don't let them earn the revenues that are due them? These talented and hard-working people have the right to earn properly for they have invested their intellect, time, money, and efforts just to entertain the public with quality movies.
So, if you do not want to receive a TCYK letter or be able to contribute to online piracy, choose to watch your favourite movies and shows through legal ways. Aside from this, take part in fighting piracy by supporting copyright tracking websites in any way you can.
Copyright Collections [http://copyrightcollectionsltd.com/legal-letters-sent-when-pursued-for-copyright-infringement/] is an entity that protects the rights of the creators and distributors of copyrighted work. Through our specialized software, we can help monitor and enforce copyright infringement on the web.

How to Be Protected From a Copyright Infringement Claim

Some areas of the copyright laws might be complicated but the basics can be simple. For instance, copyright infringement can be avoided by obtaining permission from the owner. This article will briefly define "fair use" and its four factors that the judges consider fair, namely; the character and purpose of your use, the nature, the portion taken, and the effect of your use of the original work.
"Fair use" is any copying of original work for a limited and transformative use. Also, the use of a copyrighted material is considered "fair use" if it's for the purposes of news reporting, criticism and comment, research and scholarship, parody and educational as long as it is non-profit.
To put it simply, if your use qualifies as a fair use, it can be used as a defence against a copyright infringement claim. So, before you get a Copyright Collections letter or a TCYK LLC letter, here are a few tips that could help you avoid copyright infringement altogether.
First, instead of copying, the courts consider the use of copyrighted material "fair" if it is used in a transformative way. This means that it alters the original work's fundamental character or a new expression and meaning is added to it. For example, citing a line from another poem to create a new one is considered fair use.
Second, identify the nature of the copyrighted work as it is another factor that the courts consider. Your fair use case will be stronger if you copy from a published work as unpublished ones are highly creative and are therefore more closely protected.
Third, take less from the original work for it to be excused as a fair use and make sure it's the main idea or function of that work. For copying to be fair, you should not take the most memorable part of the work. Less is more holds true in parody cases as the Supreme Court has acknowledge "the heart is also what most readily conjures up the [original] for parody, and it is the heart at which parody takes aim."
Finally, evaluate the effect of your use of the original work. To avoid a lawsuit, make sure your use does not deprive the copyright owner of a potential income of the copyrighted work or undermine a new or potential market for the original work.
Copyright infringement can be avoided by limiting yourself to "fair use" of the copyright. So, to keep from getting a Copyright Collections letter or a lawsuit, check if your use is still under fair use. You could also make your own original material and be creative so you don't have to use other people's work.

Film Copyrights In Adaptations

The millennium is the rise of adaptations. Film adaptation is a type of derivative work where a written work is transferred in part or in whole to a feature film. As an original story takes long to develop, it usually takes just 3 months to adapt a novel to a screenplay. Adaptations offer an easy way for producers to tap into the existing fan base. This invites non-readers due to their knowledge of that fan base. In a way, they are buying the fan base rather than the stories.
In Hollywood, almost two-thirds of movie productions are adapted from novels and comics. Since the earlier days, adaptations have been a filmmaking practice from various resources like plays, autobiography, and even other films. Studios like Warner Bros. Pictures, Walt Disney Pictures, and Sony Pictures are among those that produce intellectual property movies.
Here are a few examples of film adaptations from novels and comics:
From Novels (book-to-film adaptations)
· Fight Club - A comedy-drama film which was based on the novel of the same title written by Chuck Palahniuk.
· Silver Linings Playbook - A romantic comedy-drama film which was adapted from the novel by Matthew Quick.
· The Company You Keep - A TCYK LLC movie which was based on the novel of the same name; produced, directed, and starred by Robert Redford.
From Comics (comics-to-film adaptations)
· The Avengers - The Marvel team-up featuring iconic Super Heroes.
· Superman - The ultimate "man of steel" out to save the day.
· The Crow - The vengeful tale of a character resurrected by a crow.
Long-Running Series as of 2015
· The Fast and the Furious - on its 7th film
· 007 - has 24 films
Every adaptation is produced in the highest quality and packed with multiple film copyrights. Aside from the multiple copyrights; which include director's copyright, screenwriter's copyright, composer's copyright, distribution rights, product placement, and performer's rights; a film adaptation now includes rights of the existing work's owners. This means copyrights, patents, and trademarks are also included.
Dearth of Originality
Any movie's core is and should be a good, meaningful story. Popularity should not be the main focus; and with the way things are going, the film adaptation trend has become such a hit. However, bringing original content to the big screen may imply that filmmakers are running short on creative imagination and original ideas.
Nevertheless, fans should not infringe copyrighted films, may they be original or adapted.

Of Film Festivals, Creativity, and Copyrights

Movies with poor reviews do not necessarily give anyone the excuse to pirate them. Art is subjective and stealing is wrong. These are two truths that should be recalled when dealing with piracy. It is not wrong to share content as long as it doesn't cross any copyright. Copyrighted materials are certified and protected, and owners have grounds for copyright infringement claim if necessary.
Film Festivals
The world constantly asks for innovation; that's almost a rule. In film festivals, exploration and development meet. Storytellers who take risks with fresh ideas get to display their original work. It is where indie or independent artists show off their stories without political and commercial pressures, and restrictions.
Film festivals connect artists and audiences in several countries. It is a place where both established and emerging artists show documentary and dramatic films, innovative short films, cutting-edge media and art installations, and live music performances. It brings together the modern day's most original storytellers and supports engaging programs for students and the community.
Every film festival welcomes distinguished artists and opens great opportunities for students and newcomers. Some movies are even directed by celebrities. For example, "The Company You Keep" was directed and starred by an American actor. This political thriller was well-crafted, and the creator skilfully directed a cast of talented actors. When this TCYK LLC film was pirated, copyright holders tracked the infringers to protect their rights.
Media Copyright Literacy
While you play other people's intellectual property, it is essential to have a basic understanding of what is legal and ethical. Everyone should learn how to be a good digital citizen and get familiar with the copyright law and respect content creators and their original work.
Upon creation, any work is automatically copyright-protected. When your work is capable of copyright protection, it is likely that you own the copyright. However, copyright might belong to someone else if you have assigned or transferred your copyright in writing. Also, ideas cannot be protected unless it is made into its material expression like a painting, novel, or film. So it is important to transform your ideas in its material form.
Copyright protection applies to all formats whether it's in print, online, or digital media. While there are organizations that protect freedom of expression and help people understand their rights and responsibilities around copyright law, there are also entities like the owners of the TCYK LLC film that are dedicated to protecting the rights of creators and content owners.
Only the original content holders have the exclusive right to the use of their work. It isn't fair that other people commoditize from other people's work without their consent. Copying and distributing others' work without permission is copyright infringement, which means illegal distributors could be charged with a huge sum for damages.
Creativity is unique, and artists deserve all credits due to them. Some are too passionate about their craft that they don't mind how their work is being used. Unfortunately, this doesn't apply to all. Most creators need financial support to make and produce their work. Pirating does not help them in any way.

Ways to Overcome Copyright Problems

In this age of instant communication, more and more ideas are being born and products created than ever before. With the current entrepreneurial trend, new business owners are creating never-before-seen content and services in order to better the world. With so much going on, it can be easy to create something that copies another person a little too closely. Luckily, there are several steps that can be taken to overcome copyright issues.
1. Get permission from the original owner.
When it comes to using copyrighted content, the only legal way to make use of the content is to contact the original owner and ask for permission. In the event this is impossible, there are websites like Creative Commons that offer royalty-free image and audio files that are free for commercial use.
2. Trademark and copyright your own content.
If you create something you intend to turn into a business or revenue stream, it is important to obtain legal rights to it. While it may be your intellectual property, you cannot prevent someone from creating a similar idea and starting a business based on it. It's important to trademark and copyright your ideas in order to protect them.
3. Obtain a legal copyright.
Intellectual property can be copyrighted by simply putting the copyright symbol in front of it with your name. However, the Copyright Act covers certain topics that are not so easy to claim ownership of, including architectural and choreographic works. Speaking to a copyright lawyer is the way to go to properly claim ownership of your own work and prevent illegal copying of it.
4. Trademark your property.
A trademark differs from a copyright primarily in the things it protects. While a copyright is usually used to cover a creative work, trademarks are used to protect names, logos, symbols, and other corporate IPs. The process of trademarking a property is lengthy and complicated, so it's best to consult professional help. You must first search to ensure no similar trademarks exist to the one you want to file; even if an existing trademark isn't identical, one that is too similar can make it impossible for you file.
5. Remember: registration isn't absolutely required.
Since 1978, there has been no formal requirement in the United States for copyrighted work to bear the copyright symbol. A novel, for instance, is protected as soon as it is 'saved' in a word document. That said, registering the work offers certain protections that proprietary copyrighting does not. A person can only sue over copyright issue if their copyright is registered. The restitution a person may receive for damages will only count after the content is registered, not before.
While it may be an extra step, taking the time to copyright and trademark your property, whether intellectual or physical, can protect it in ways that claiming ownership cannot. Copyright issues can pose a number of problems for content creators or those who want to use content, but knowing how to overcome this problems before they arise can prevent a lot of headaches.

opyright Infringement in the Digital World

Downloading files from the internet is not a crime, but if you download files for free which you usually have to pay for, then there's a problem. The piracy issue occurs when the copyright owners do not get the amount that they are due.
Piracy is the illegal copying and selling of copyrighted materials, but the common misconception is that people don't think it matters because no one gets hurt. In reality, the evolution of piracy from burning CDs and DVDs to digital copying has affected the global economy. Pirating a physical copy or streaming illegally affects the livelihood of artists too.
Pirated copies are not always great
Most of the time, illegal copies do not have the same quality as the legal content. A pirated movie may have been recorded on a camcorder at the back of a cinema, so the quality is poor. Its content may be grainy or black and white at some parts. Copies downloaded from the internet on the other hand may suddenly stop at some parts and the sound quality can be very quiet and muffled.
Easy digital access
Downloading directly from the computer has become popular among internet users primarily because of the ease of access. Even with the number of sites that offer legal downloads, there are still file-sharing networks that offer free access to copyrighted materials. And it's sad that many are active in some form of piracy, either through streaming, downloading, or the old school style of buying counterfeit DVDs.
In any case, piracy costs the entertainment industry. It is stealing from the businesses involved in the art. People must remember that nothing is free. Pirate sites make money through subscription costs or advertising when a consumer streams illegal content. The operators of these sites earn from sharing copyrighted materials that they do not own and have no permission to distribute.
How to minimize the problem?
Having internet service providers get on board in helping fight piracy and detect copyright infringements has always been a struggle. It would require content holders to educate people and private entities to be responsible, make them understand the importance of copyright, and encourage them to support different ways to consume content legally like going to the cinema or subscribing to Netflix and other video-on-demand sites.
Piracy may not be easy to kill but it can be reduced. Besides, with all the latest technology coming out, we only need to keep up. Also, there are entities that help fight piracy with the use of software to detect copyright infringements.

How to Come Up With Your Best Legal Move for Copyright Cases

Whether you're the alleged infringer or the copyright owner, calculating damages for a copyright infringement case is critical in determining your potential legal strategy. To analyse, the first thing to consider is if the pirated work has been registered with the copyright office. Registered works are afforded greater protection and these registration records can be found in a free online database. To access the copyright registration records, you need to go to the Copyright Office website.
Statutory and Actual Damages
Your best legal strategy is not only determined by the best copyright infringement software. Read on to know more about the types of calculated damages that could just help determine what works well for your case.
Statutory damages are often higher than actual damages and they are easier to calculate. So the majority of plaintiffs or content owners usually choose to pursue for statutory damages. For illegal filesharing cases for example, actual damages per pirated song may be around $1; however, statutory damages could go up to $20,000 or more.
Regardless of the actual damages suffered by the content owner, the amount of statutory damages is set by law. Each infringement usually range from $750 to $30,000, but damages for "innocent infringers" can go as low as $200 and up to $150,000 if the court determines that the defendant acted "wilfully". The courts do not award damages outside this range and they consider the purpose of the infringing use, the value of the infringed work, and the infringer's intent or state.
Aside from statutory damages, plaintiffs can also ask for attorney's fees and if awarded, the infringer will owe them the total sum or part of the legal fees plus the fees of their own lawyer. Although attorney's fees are awarded through the discretion of the court, unregistered copyright is never allowed to ask for attorney's fees.
Plaintiffs pursue actual damages when their infringed work was not registered prior to the infringement. This type of damage is the calculable profit the infringer has gained from infringing the copyrights or monetary loss that the content owner has suffered.
Proper Analysis
Aside from getting a better understanding of the strength of your copyright infringement case, proper analysis of the potential damages plays an important role in determining a legal strategy. Calculating damages for copyright infringement is just one of the things involved in determining a person's rights under the copyright law.
Most copyright cases do not go to trial and some defendants even choose to settle as the cost of a court case is already high, and added legal fees could possibly grow larger too. So, if you feel like your work has been infringed, talk to a copyright entity. They can help you identify the individual specifics that you will need to determine to come up with the best legal actions. Also, they use high-quality copyright infringement software to track pirates.

How To Respond To Settlement Letters In Copyright Infringement Cases

Settlement letters are sent to particular internet subscribers who are identified to have infringed a copyrighted material. Also known as letter of demand (LOD), the letter is usually composed of the name of the infringer, IP address, and all the details about copyright infringement. First of all, getting a demand letter such as a TCYK letter more likely means that you did violate the law and the copyright enforcers have evidence to prove that you have infringed a copyrighted content. Second, it is not advisable to just ignore the letter as it could result to serious legal consequences. So, when you get a demand letter, respond to it. In every illegal download case, ask about the situation or what the letter means. If you ever find yourself as a "John Doe" defendant, here are a few practical tips that can help you in your defense in the lawsuit:
- Settlement amounts are usually negotiable. If you get a TCYK letter or any settlement letter, chances are you will be offered a settlement amount. The figure may be changed depending on your approach or how you attempt to negotiate. So, it would not hurt to try especially if you really did it.
- Among the copyrighted materials that you can possibly pirate, porn bears the most embarrassment and it involves more risks so find a way to settle quickly. Don't waste your time delaying the case. It is best to make it go away the minute it's presented to you.
- Do not fight a subpoena. Doing so could only expose your identity. Copyright infringement is not something that you could just take for granted. You need to protect your own identification and avoid a potential scandal that will not help you in any way in your life.
- Fighting a case could lead to more expensive costs compared to every negotiated settlement. Besides the hassle that can be expected in a lawsuit, there are legal fees that you need to consider should you decide to fight a case. You may get a total that could have been avoided if you just settle.
As provided by copyright law, a copyright grants a creator exclusive rights to the distribution or reproduction of his original work. There may be exceptions but initially, the creator owns the copyright of their created work. It would be good if people have a better understanding of how creators such as those in the entertainment industry come up with works of art. But in the meantime, they should focus on how to respond to a letter of demand.

Basics of Navigating the Digital Millennium Copyright Act ("DMCA")

Due to the proliferation of the Internet, social media platforms, and hosting websites, online service providers have often become unwitting hosts to materials that may potentially infringe on the copyrights of another. Likewise, original content creators have also increasingly found themselves to be targets of unjustified DMCA takedown requests. Sometimes these takedown requests are made for anti-competitive or harassing purposes by competitors of the website operator.
The Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA) provides a safe harbor in certain circumstances for website operators, who host materials submitted by third parties that may infringe the copyrights of others. If the copyright owner provides a take down notice in compliance with the requirements of the DMCA and the website operator timely complies with its obligations under the DMCA, it may be shielded from liability for copyright infringement. The website operator can adopt and post a copyright policy to facilitate DMCA compliance. A sample copyright policy is below, which requests that a takedown notice including at least the following information:
· A detailed description of the copyrighted work you believe is being infringed upon;
· A description of the location of where the alleged infringing content appears;
· Your contact information (including name, address, telephone number, and email address);
· A statement that you have a good faith belief that the alleged infringing use is not authorized by you as the copyright owner, your agent, or by law;
· A statement affirming that, under penalty of perjury, the information in the notice is accurate and that you are indeed authorized to act on behalf of the copyright owner; and
· An original signature of the copyright owner or someone authorized on the owner's behalf to assert infringement of the copyright as well as to submit the claim.
In addition to the policy, the website operator should register an agent with the United States Copyright Office.
While the above identifies a number of eCommerce and internet law issues affecting compliance with the DMCA, an in-depth analysis may be required. For example, the timeliness requirement for the takedown has been a hot litigation topic lately. Additionally, the DMCA applies to copyrights only, and does not currently provide a safe harbor for trademark infringement or patent infringement claims. These type of claims stemming from users of the website can be addressed in the Terms of Use or other website agreement between the website operator and its users.
For more information, you may want to contact a DMCA attorney with experience in DMCA compliance, copyright policies, and DMCA takedown notices.
Disclaimer - As with any discussion of legal topics, this article is intended to be educational only, and is not a substitute for legal advice, nor does it provide legal advice or form an attorney-client relationship with the reader. Please seek legal counsel before making any decisions. Also, please note that this article will likely not be updated, so the law and circumstances may have changed by the time you have read this article.
Darin M. Klemchuk is an intellectual property (IP) trial lawyer, with significant experience enforcing patent, trademark, copyright, and trade secret rights. He also focuses his practice on internet law and ecommerce.