A series of events in Australia in the last few days have quite frankly left me reeling in shock and surprise. The first was an incident where an 18-year- old boy was shot dead by police. Technically he's a man but I call him a boy. A boy who was foolish and very naïve. A brain washed jihadist. A supporter of ISIL, a Muslim extremist group, which wants to destroy all of us for no reason other than, who we are and how we live. He came to the attention of authorities for some of the things he was saying on social media like wanting to behead police, drape their bodies in the ISIS flag and post the images online. He also made death threats against the Australian Prime Minister.
Very surprisingly and quite ironically the police decided to deal with this by taking a fairly low, key approach. Instead of a dawn raid and arresting him at gunpoint they invited him to come and see them at the police station. They arranged a time and he turned up to be met by two officers outside the station. What happened next will become the subject of an official inquiry. But it appears that when one of the policemen tried to shake his hand in greeting, the 18-year-old produced a knife and began hacking at the two policemen. It is believed that one of the policemen fired a single, fatal shot at the 18-year-old. It was both tragic and senseless.
This young boy was seen talking with older men before this incident occurred which supports the idea that he was not acting alone. He first came to the attention of police and intelligence authorities, three months ago, because he was part of a small group of men sharing messages preaching violence and hate. Authorities were concerned he may try to join ISIL in Syria and Iraq so they cancelled his passport.
The second disturbing report was an allegation of a second, separate attack on a serving member of the Australian Army who was walking along the street minding his own business. The catalyst for the attack was the fact that he was wearing the Australian Army uniform. In a recent development, police are now saying the attack didn't happen but it was enough for Australian Defence Force Chiefs to issue an order for defence force personnel not to wear their uniform in public. Reports of these two incidents coincide with ISIL using social media to call on its supporters to attack indiscriminately. They were told they did not need the authority of a senior Muslim cleric, they should just go ahead and wage jihad and God was on their side. These people seem to be under the illusion that we are back in the Middle Ages fighting some sort of mythical crusade. Muslim versus Christian. What is most disturbing is that a number of young Muslim men, in a number of Western countries believe in this nonsense. What worries me the most about these developments is that this could be a double-edged sword. We need to be worried about radicalised Jihadists but we should also be equally worried about whack jobs who want to attack Muslims for being Muslim. There's been reported incidents of vandalism and graffiti but fortunately no violence.Here is a small reality check.
The vast majority of Muslims in Australia, or anywhere else in the world are not defined by what the Islamic State does in Iraq and Syria. They are peace-loving people who believe in tolerance, benevolence and humanity. As President Obama quite correctly pointed out, No God condones terror.But there is no denying these incidents frighten people and when people are frightened they lose perspective and forget to think and respond rationally.
And what usually follows is that other unfortunate by-product - the rights and freedoms that we have come to expect and accept are suddenly under threat.
The Australian Prime Minister said as much the other day. In a speech clearly aimed at softening up the country he said some freedoms needed to be sacrificed in order to protect the vast majority. He asked Australians to support this shift in what he called the delicate balance between freedom and security. We are only just beginning to find out what this actually means. In Federal Parliament late last night a bill was passed giving Australia's domestic spy agency, the Australian Security Intelligence Organization, unprecedented and unfettered power to monitor the entire Australian internet. All that is needed is one warrant. It passed with bi-partisan support so the Opposition clearly agreed with the Government. ASIO will be able to copy, delete or modify data held on any computer it has a warrant to monitor. It also allows ASIO to disrupt target computers and use innocent third-party computers not targeted as a way of accessing targeted computers. Many lawyers and academics are saying this bill goes too far. Australian Attorney-General George Brandis says we all better get used to living in this "newly dangerous age." It is vital he said to equip those protecting Australia with the necessary powers and capabilities needed to do their job.
That's all well and good but what about the checks and balances? Where are they? How can we be sure that ASIO won't abuse these massive new powers? And if you are worried about these questions, and you should be, then what I am about to tell should make you even more worried. The bill also allows for journalists, whistle-blowers and bloggers who " recklessly" disclose information that relates to a special intelligence operation to be jailed for ten years. Get this. Any operation can be declared to be "special" by an ASIO agent. It also gives ASIO immunity from criminal and civil liability in certain circumstances. In other words it makes them pretty much untouchable.
Now don't get my wrong. I am all for giving law enforcement the powers they need to do their job but that doesn't mean they have an open checkbook. And going after whistleblowers and journalists providing the necessary balance, threatening them with a hefty prison sentence, is not a good thing in a democratic country. It is very much the case of shooting the messenger. Of course with the threat of a ten-year prison sentence hanging over them, whistleblowers will become extinct. I'm sure that is exactly what Governments around the world want to happen. I'm sorry but I don't trust ASIO not to abuse its powers. Unless we have something or someone keeping a watchful eye out on behalf of us all there is a danger that the so-called cure could end up being far worse than the disease.
Very surprisingly and quite ironically the police decided to deal with this by taking a fairly low, key approach. Instead of a dawn raid and arresting him at gunpoint they invited him to come and see them at the police station. They arranged a time and he turned up to be met by two officers outside the station. What happened next will become the subject of an official inquiry. But it appears that when one of the policemen tried to shake his hand in greeting, the 18-year-old produced a knife and began hacking at the two policemen. It is believed that one of the policemen fired a single, fatal shot at the 18-year-old. It was both tragic and senseless.
This young boy was seen talking with older men before this incident occurred which supports the idea that he was not acting alone. He first came to the attention of police and intelligence authorities, three months ago, because he was part of a small group of men sharing messages preaching violence and hate. Authorities were concerned he may try to join ISIL in Syria and Iraq so they cancelled his passport.
The second disturbing report was an allegation of a second, separate attack on a serving member of the Australian Army who was walking along the street minding his own business. The catalyst for the attack was the fact that he was wearing the Australian Army uniform. In a recent development, police are now saying the attack didn't happen but it was enough for Australian Defence Force Chiefs to issue an order for defence force personnel not to wear their uniform in public. Reports of these two incidents coincide with ISIL using social media to call on its supporters to attack indiscriminately. They were told they did not need the authority of a senior Muslim cleric, they should just go ahead and wage jihad and God was on their side. These people seem to be under the illusion that we are back in the Middle Ages fighting some sort of mythical crusade. Muslim versus Christian. What is most disturbing is that a number of young Muslim men, in a number of Western countries believe in this nonsense. What worries me the most about these developments is that this could be a double-edged sword. We need to be worried about radicalised Jihadists but we should also be equally worried about whack jobs who want to attack Muslims for being Muslim. There's been reported incidents of vandalism and graffiti but fortunately no violence.Here is a small reality check.
The vast majority of Muslims in Australia, or anywhere else in the world are not defined by what the Islamic State does in Iraq and Syria. They are peace-loving people who believe in tolerance, benevolence and humanity. As President Obama quite correctly pointed out, No God condones terror.But there is no denying these incidents frighten people and when people are frightened they lose perspective and forget to think and respond rationally.
And what usually follows is that other unfortunate by-product - the rights and freedoms that we have come to expect and accept are suddenly under threat.
The Australian Prime Minister said as much the other day. In a speech clearly aimed at softening up the country he said some freedoms needed to be sacrificed in order to protect the vast majority. He asked Australians to support this shift in what he called the delicate balance between freedom and security. We are only just beginning to find out what this actually means. In Federal Parliament late last night a bill was passed giving Australia's domestic spy agency, the Australian Security Intelligence Organization, unprecedented and unfettered power to monitor the entire Australian internet. All that is needed is one warrant. It passed with bi-partisan support so the Opposition clearly agreed with the Government. ASIO will be able to copy, delete or modify data held on any computer it has a warrant to monitor. It also allows ASIO to disrupt target computers and use innocent third-party computers not targeted as a way of accessing targeted computers. Many lawyers and academics are saying this bill goes too far. Australian Attorney-General George Brandis says we all better get used to living in this "newly dangerous age." It is vital he said to equip those protecting Australia with the necessary powers and capabilities needed to do their job.
That's all well and good but what about the checks and balances? Where are they? How can we be sure that ASIO won't abuse these massive new powers? And if you are worried about these questions, and you should be, then what I am about to tell should make you even more worried. The bill also allows for journalists, whistle-blowers and bloggers who " recklessly" disclose information that relates to a special intelligence operation to be jailed for ten years. Get this. Any operation can be declared to be "special" by an ASIO agent. It also gives ASIO immunity from criminal and civil liability in certain circumstances. In other words it makes them pretty much untouchable.
Now don't get my wrong. I am all for giving law enforcement the powers they need to do their job but that doesn't mean they have an open checkbook. And going after whistleblowers and journalists providing the necessary balance, threatening them with a hefty prison sentence, is not a good thing in a democratic country. It is very much the case of shooting the messenger. Of course with the threat of a ten-year prison sentence hanging over them, whistleblowers will become extinct. I'm sure that is exactly what Governments around the world want to happen. I'm sorry but I don't trust ASIO not to abuse its powers. Unless we have something or someone keeping a watchful eye out on behalf of us all there is a danger that the so-called cure could end up being far worse than the disease.